Cases 21 - 30 of 74
Mejia et al v. Rightway Funding LLC
as 2:2019cv00151
Plaintiff:
Luis Mejia and Deanna Mejia
Defendant:
Rightway Funding LLC
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Mejia De Del Corral et al
as 1:2018cv22749
Defendant:
Carlos Del Corral, Fadelma Investments Corp., Alejandro Del Corral and others
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
USA v. Sergio Mejia-Duarte
as 18-12196
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SERGIO NEFTALI MEJIA-DUARTE, a.k.a. Neftali a.k.a. Compa a.k.a. El Doctor a.k.a. Cunado
In re: Raul Eraso-Mejia
as 18-11154
Petitioner:
In re: RAUL ANTONIO ERASO-MEJIA
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Mejia v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 18-11111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MEJIA
Defendant - Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Government Employees Insurance Co. et al v. DG Esthetic and Therapy Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv20921
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Co. , Geico Indemnity Co. , GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Defendant:
DG Esthetic and Therapy Center, Inc. , D.A. Health Care Associates, Inc. , Damarys Alfonso and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USA v. Horacio Cruz-Rodriguez
as 17-15004
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HORACIO CRUZ-RODRIGUEZ, a.k.a. Jose Mejia-Rodriguez, a.k.a. Jose Cruz-Rodriguez, a.k.a. Jose Cruz
USA v. Raul Eraso-Mejia
as 17-14367
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL ANTONIO ERASO-MEJIA
Lavigne et al v. HERBALIFE, LTD et al
as 1:2017cv23429
Plaintiff:
Michael Lavigne , Jennifer Lavigne , Cody Pyle and others
Defendant:
HERBALIFE, LTD, HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL, INC, HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL OF AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
MEJIA v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
as 0:2017cv61617
Plaintiff:
JOSE MEJIA
Defendant:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
