Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Risk v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 0:2018cv61300
Plaintiff:
Linus Michael Risk and Linda Pauline Risk
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Social Security Administration and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collins v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 6:2018cv00677
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Collins
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barclay v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 9:2017cv81267
Plaintiff:
Lester Barclay
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv21997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mortgage Resolution Services, LLC et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 8:2017mc00044
Plaintiff:
Mortgage Resolution Services, LLC , 1st Fidelity Loan Servicing, LLC and S & A Capital Partners, Inc.
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Chase Home Finance LLC and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv60690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Newkirk v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA.
as 8:2017cv00630
Plaintiff:
Raymond Newkirk
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Susquahanna Shawanwa Lenape Nation et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 8:2017mc00035
Plaintiff:
Susquahanna Shawanwa Lenape Nation, Roosevelt Mitchell El and Andrea L. Mitchell El
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Regions Bank and Mortgage Electronic Registrations Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
