Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Rosario Vasquez-Herandez, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 15-14976
Petitioner:
ROSARIO MARIA VASQUEZ-HERANDEZ, JACKELINE ROXANNE MUNOZ-VASQUEZ and KATHERINE GISSELLE MUNOZ-VASQUEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Rosario Rivera
as 15-12345
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ROSARIO RIVERA
Rojo v. J.P Morgan Chase
as 1:2015cv21571
Plaintiff:
Rosario Rojo
Defendant:
J.P Morgan Chase, Washington Mutual and Chase Home Finance
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Sonia Mendoza-Beltran v. U.S. Attorney General
as 14-13023
Petitioner:
SONIA DEL ROSARIO MENDOZA-BELTRAN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Casani, et al v. Seaboard Marine, LTD, Inc et al
as 1:2014cv22261
Plaintiff:
Acni Yanina Sanchez Casani , Maria Jesus Flores Samdmann Vda De Reyes , Lucia Del Rosario Reyes Flores and others
Defendant:
Seaboard Marine, LTD., Inc. , Mastermind Shipment, LTD. and Melato Shipping Co. LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rosario et al v. ATI Enterprises of Florida, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv20832
Plaintiff:
Maria Rosario , Sajeev Bhaskaran , Rajan Daniel and others
Defendant:
ATI Enterprises of Florida, Inc., ATI Enterprises, Inc. and American Trades Institute of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Esteban Rosario
as 12-14300
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ESTEBAN ALCAPONE ROSARIO
Rojo v. Florida Power & Light et al
as 1:2011cv24373
Plaintiff:
Rosario Rojo
Defendant:
Florida Power & Light and Art Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Maximino Nunez
as 11-12998
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAXIMINO MATEO NUNEZ, a.k.a. Jose Carlos Rosario Martinez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
