Cases 31 - 40 of 316
Toll v. North et al
as 0:2021cv62527
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Warren Toll
Defendant:
Levi North and Bennett Reeber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Truist Investment Services, Inc. v. Warren et al
as 0:2021cv62251
Plaintiff:
Truist Investment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
James H Warren and Linda J. Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Truist Investment Services, Inc. v. Warren et al
as 0:2021cv62253
Plaintiff:
Truist Investment Services, Inc.
Defendant:
James H. Warren and Linda J. Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Waseem Daker v. Therese Barnes, et al
as 21-13801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
THERESE S. BARNES, HAROLD D. MELTON, DAVID ERICH NAHMIAS and others
Timothy Littlejohn v. Herschberger, et al
as 21-13552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE LITTLEJOHN
Defendant / Appellee:
HERSCHBERGER, SINUARD LOSSING, WALRAVEN and others
Timothy Littlejohn v. Wellpath, et al
as 21-13554
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE LITTLEJOHN
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, JOHN DOE, Supervisor over Mental Health of Wellpath, HINDASH, DR. and others
Timothy Littlejohn v. Neil Warren, et al
as 21-13545
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE LITTLEJOHN
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL WARREN, Sheriff, WILLIAMS, VAUGHN and others
Warren Oliver v. Calderon, et al
as 21-13347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN L. OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
CALDERON, PAPP, in her individual and official capacity, S. JOHNSON and others
Warren Diamond, et al v. Scott Diamond
as 21-13247
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WARREN DIAMOND, asTrustee of the Diamond Trust u/a/d October 28, 2005 and FAITH DIAMOND, as Trustee of the Diamond Trust u/a/d October 28, 2005
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT DIAMOND
Richard Warren v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 21-12765
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L. WARREN
Respondent / Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
