Cases 51 - 60 of 571
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gernard D. ChestnutIn re: Gernard D. Chestnut
as 21-14488
Petitioner:
In re: GERNARD CHESTNUT
Respondent:
SANTA ROSA CI WARDEN, J. NEEL, Lieutenant, HUGHES, Lieutenant and others
James Davis v. Warden, et al
as 21-14344
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES HENRY DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Henry Richardson v. USA
as 21-14228
Petitioner / Appellant:
HENRY RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Zurich American Insurance Company, et al v. Henry Hardin, III
as 21-90031
Petitioner:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY and THE ZURICH SERVICES CORPORATION
Respondent:
HENRY C. HARDIN, III
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Marie Henry v. City of Mount Dora, et al
as 21-14120
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE HENRY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MOUNT DORA, BRETT LIVINGSTON, In his Official and Individual Capacities, T. RANDALL SCOGGINS, In his Official and Individual Capacities and others
USA v. Patrick Joseph
as 21-14095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PATRICK HENRY JOSEPH
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
John Givens v. Warden, Ventress Correctional Facility, et al
as 21-13967
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN HENRY GIVENS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, VENTRESS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Henry Smith v. Donald McMillian, et al
as 21-13878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY CLAY SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE, DONALD MCMILLIAN, Judge and MARY B. WINDOM, Judge
Costadaryll Hughley v. Federal Drug Enforcement Administration, et al
as 21-13840
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COSTADARYLL HUGHLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, Administrator, Orlando District Office, TIMOTHY J. SHEA, KELLEY PENNINGTON, S.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
