Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BINDSLEV v. SILVA
as 1:2024cv21088
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN BINDSLEV
Defendant:
MELISSA CAROLINA SILVA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Rosana Bezerra da Silva, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10654
Petitioner:
ROSANA BEZERRA DA SILVA, OSEAS RODRIGUES DE OLIVEIRA, HELOISY RODRIGUES DA SILVA and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gleicielle Da Silva Souza, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10543
Petitioner:
GLEICIELLE DA SILVA SOUZA, RENAN DOS SANTOS ARAUJO and RYAN DA SILVA SANTOS ARAUJO
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jozadaque Rodrigues da Silva, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10517
Petitioner:
JOZADAQUE RODRIGUES DA SILVA, SIMONE LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA, JULIA RHAYALLA LOPES RODRIGUES DA SILVA and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Daniel Macedo de Sousa, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10340
Petitioner:
DANIEL MACEDO DE SOUSA, NOEME SILVA DA COSTA and ISA EMANUELLE MACEDO SILVA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Elioni Goncalves-Dos Santos, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10167
Petitioner:
ELIONI GONCALVES-DOS SANTOS, EDIVON BORJES DE SILVA, MARIA LOPEZ DOS SANTOS SUZA and others
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodrigo Da Dilva Castilho, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 23-13850
Petitioner:
RODRIGO DA DILVA CASTILHO, GLEICIELY DA SILVA DANTAS and ISSABELA DANTAS DE OLVEIRA
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Wellekson Silva v. Adriene dos Santos
as 23-12456
Petitioner:
WELLEKSON GONCALVES SILVA
Respondent:
ADRIENE FERREIRA DOS SANTOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
