Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Arakelyan v. Marianna Zadov P.A.
as 9:2021cv81142
Plaintiff:
Armenui Arakelyan
Defendant:
Marianna Zadov P.A. doing business as Polo Dental
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Arakelyan v. Marianna Zadov P.A.
as 9:2021cv81143
Plaintiff:
Armenui Arakelyan
Defendant:
Marianna Zadov P.A. doing business as Polo Dental
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Frank Polo, Sr. v. Lilly Real
as 20-13371
Defendant / Appellee:
LILLY JOSEPHINE REAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK E. POLO, SR.
Gayle et al v. Field Office Director Miami Field Office et al
as 1:2020cv21553
Petitioner:
Rene Jonathan Rosas Cardenas, Roseline Ostine, Mohamed Hasan and others
Respondent:
Field Office Director, Miami Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Attorney General
Special Master:
Matthew C Dates
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rodney Martin, Hatem Chourabi, Esq. Sharon Kegerreis and others
Intervenor:
Reinier Guiba Avila, Luis Enrique Lopez-Pena, Lazaro Jose Gutierrez Suarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
The Copyrights Group Limited et al
as 9:2020cv80196
Petitioner:
The Copyrights Group Limited, Greenwich Polo Club, Inc., PJB Brands Limited and others
The Copyrights Group Limited et al
as 9:2020mc80196
Petitioner:
The Copyrights Group Limited, Greenwich Polo Club, Inc., PJB Brands Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Frank Polo, Sr. v. Lilly Real
as 19-13661
Defendant / Appellee:
LILLY JOSEPHINE REAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK E. POLO, SR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv23540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Jesse Foots
as 15-15318
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JESSE FOOTS, a.k.a. Polo
USA v. Norris Lundy
as 12-14351
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NORRIS LUNDY, a.k.a. Polo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
