Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Robert Rogers v. Jackson County Florida, et al
as 23-11732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT M. ROGERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JACKSON COUNTY FLORIDA, A Florida County and Political Subdivision of the State of Florida and JAMES D. PEACOCK, Individually and in His Capacity as County Commissioner
ISACKS et al v. WALTON COUNTY
as 3:2020cv01472
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA and WALTON COUNTY
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY R. JONES, TRUSTEE, EMILY W. BOWRON, LEONARD S. ISACKS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEPHENS v. WALTON COUNTY
as 3:2020cv01465
Plaintiff:
JAMES T STEPHENS, DELL S. BROOKE, VICTOR CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA and WALTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ISACKS et al v. WALTON COUNTY
as 3:2020cv01115
Plaintiff:
LEONARD ISACKS and SEAGROVE HOUSE, LLC
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horacio Sequeira v. The Republic of Nicaragua, et al
as 17-15502
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HORACIO SEQUEIRA
Defendant - Appellee:
THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA, a foreign country, CITY OF CHINANDEGA, a political subdivision of the foreign Country Of the Republic of Nicaragua, EDUARDO JOSE CALLEJAS CALLEJAS, an individual citizen of the United States of America and others
126th Avenue Landfill, Inc., et al v. Pinellas County, FL
as 10-14529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
126TH AVENUE LANDFILL, INC., a Florida corporation and RICHARD L. HAIN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PINELLAS COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida
Forsyth County v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng., et al
as 10-10279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FORSYTH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Georgia
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, YMCA OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA, INC., BYRON G. JORNS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
