Cases 31 - 40 of 298
Nardone v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
as 1:2023cv21162
Plaintiff:
Diane Nardone
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Smith v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Arlene Smith
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rolon v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 6:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
Steven Rolon
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CARVAJAL v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2023cv20667
Plaintiff:
PERLA MARINA CARVAJAL
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CARVAJAL v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2023cv20662
Plaintiff:
PERLA MARINA CARVAJAL
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARVAJAL v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2023cv20652
Plaintiff:
perla marina carvajal
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Gergely v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Dianne Gergely
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schrag v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2022cv23852
Plaintiff:
Paul Schrag
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Schrag v. Monsanto Company et al
as 1:2022cv23855
Plaintiff:
Paul Schrag
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Aciego, et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2022cv01292
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Golden Aciego and Jon Henry Aciego
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
