Cases 51 - 60 of 328
Chambers v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Lynnetta Chambers
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Chambers v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Lynnetta Chambers
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
MOODY v. CIRCLE K STORES INC et al.,
as 1:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOODY
Defendant:
Circle K Stores, Inc., CIRCLE K STORES INC and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
JANE DOE v. NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv22302
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
NCL (BAHAMAS) LTD., ONE SPA WORLD LLC and MANDARA SPA (HAWAII), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Betz v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Teresa Betz
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Peterson v. Circle K Stores Inc.
as 5:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Stacey Peterson
Defendant:
Circle K Stores Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
DOE (S.K) v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv22129
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE (S.K)
Defendant:
CARNIVAL CORPORATION and ONE SPA WORLD LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Moreta v. CVS Healthcare Practices LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Ivelisse Moreta
Defendant:
CVS Healthcare Practices, Jane Doe and CVS Healthcare Practices LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Suckie v. Conn Appliances, Inc.
as 6:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Crystal Suckie
Defendant:
Conn Appliances, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Doe v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2023cv22017
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
