Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Badchkam v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv14142
Plaintiff:
Annette Badchkam and Annette Badchkam
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., LTD., Knauf Plasterboard (WUHU) Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Malkki et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv14128
Plaintiff:
Donna Malkki and Sppo Malkki
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., LTD., Knauf Plasterboard (WUHU) Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Teefy et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv14127
Plaintiff:
Thomas Teefy and Susan Teefy
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., LTD., Knauf Plasterboard (Wuhu) Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Downs et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv14126
Plaintiff:
Terel Downs and Patricia Downs
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co LTD, Knauf Plasterboard (Wuhu) Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
O'Hear v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv14129
Plaintiff:
Anne M. O'Hear
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., LTD., Knauf Plasterboard (WUHU) Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kelly v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv14125
Plaintiff:
Francine Kelly
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard ( Tianjin ) Co., Ltd., Knauf Plasterboard (Wuhu) Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ankney v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 2:2009cv00166
Plaintiff:
Duane Ankney
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co., LTD., Knauf Plasterboard (WUHU) Co. LTD and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Riesz et al v. Knauf Plasterboard et al
as 0:2009cv60371
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Riesz, Lawrence Riesz, Lawrence Riesz and others
Defendant:
Knauf Plasterboard, Tianjin Co., Knauf Gips KG and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
