Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Herlihy v. Gourment To Go, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv60383
Plaintiff:
Trisha Herlihy and Trisha Herlihy
Defendant:
Gourment To Go, Inc. and Hugh McCauley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goings v. Advanced Systems, Inc. of Suncoast
as 8:2008cv01110
Plaintiff:
Edward Goings
Defendant:
Advanced Systems, Inc. of Suncoast
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michalak v. Louie Louie, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv60725
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Michalak
Defendant:
Louie Louie, Inc., Louie Louie To Go, Inc. and Robert Woltin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Soares v. Communications to Go, Inc. et al
as 6:2008cv00099
Plaintiff:
Lysandra Soares
Defendant:
Communications to Go, Inc. and Luis Pompa
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Tunison v. Pay Go Wireless, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv14378
Plaintiff:
Tom Tunison and Tom Tunison
Defendant:
Pay Go Wireless, Inc. and George Bodo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Castro v. Communications To Go, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv22590
Plaintiff:
Christian Castro and Christian Castro
Defendant:
Communications To Go, Inc. and Luis R. Pompa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Burch v. Louie Louie To Go, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv60170
Plaintiff:
Brian Burch and Brian Burch
Defendant:
Louie Louie To Go, Inc., Louie Louie Investments, Inc. and Robert Woltin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Navarro v. Louie Louie To Go, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv60171
Plaintiff:
Raul Navarro and Raul Navarro
Defendant:
Louie Louie To Go, Inc. and Robert Woltin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Del Valle v. Empanadas To Go, LLC et al
as 0:2007cv60111
Plaintiff:
Carlos Del Valle
Defendant:
Empanadas To Go, LLC, ETG Foods, LLC, E2G Ventures, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
