Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv21923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bartomeo v. Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 0:2013cv61091
Plaintiff:
Pietro Bartomeo
Defendant:
Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cora et al v. Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 9:2013cv80495
Plaintiff:
Norma Cora and Kevin Cora
Defendant:
Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bansbach v. Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 0:2013cv61069
Plaintiff:
David Bansbach
Defendant:
Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Evans v. Commercial Recovery Systems Inc
as 0:2013cv61031
Plaintiff:
Steve Evans
Defendant:
Commercial Recovery Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bustillos v. Commercial Recovery Systems Inc
as 0:2013cv61013
Plaintiff:
David Bustillos
Defendant:
Commercial Recovery Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Adams v. Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 1:2013cv21468
Plaintiff:
Nancy Adams
Defendant:
Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Parker v. Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 0:2013cv60961
Plaintiff:
Jason Parker
Defendant:
Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Frausto v. Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
as 0:2013cv60954
Plaintiff:
Octavio Frausto
Defendant:
Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
