Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Larry Klayman v. Stephanie Deluca, et al
as 16-11822
Defendant / Appellant:
HEWITT SHAW, BAKER HOSTETLER, JAMES ROLLINSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant:
STEPHANIE DELUCA
Larry Klayman v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 15-14080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, CLINTON FOUNDATION, 1271 Avenue of the Americans, 42nd Floor New York, New York 10020 Service: Chairman Bruce Lindsey or Vice -Chairman Chelsea Clinton Mezvinsky (nee' Chelsea Victoria Clinton), a.k.a. The William J. Clinton Foundation, a.k.a. The Bill, H and others
Larry Klayman v. City Pages, et al
as 15-12731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY PAGES, KEN WEINER, a.k.a. Ken Avidor, AARON RUPAR and others
Larry Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., et al
as 15-12085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., THOMAS FITTON, PAUL ORFANEDES and others
Larry Klayman v. City Pages, et al
as 15-11489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY PAGES, KEN WEINER, a.k.a. Ken Avidor, AARON RUPAR and others
Klayman v. Clinton et al
as 9:2015cv80388
Plaintiff:
Larry E Klayman
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton , William Jefferson Clinton and Clinton Foundation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
In re: Larry Klayman
as 15-10546
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Mandamus Respondent:
CITY PAGES, KEN WEINER, a.k.a. Ken Avidor, AARON RUPAR and others
Larry Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., et al
as 14-13855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., THOMAS FITTON, PAUL ORFANEDES and others
Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv20610
Plaintiff:
Larry E Klayman
Defendant:
Judicial Watch, Inc., Thomas Fitton, Paul Orfanedes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
