Cases 21 - 30 of 111
IPS Avon Park Corporation, et al v. Kinder Morgan, Inc., et al
as 22-10547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IPS AVON PARK CORPORATION and D E JONES CONSULTING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KINDER MORGAN, INC., EL PASO LLC and MESQUITE INVESTORS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00565
Plaintiff:
CARLOS E. JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67163
Plaintiff:
MARK E JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61097
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50478
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45318
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35159
Plaintiff:
SAM E JONES III
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. David Jones
as 21-11970
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID E. JONES, a.k.a. David Emanuel Jones
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22664
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRAD E JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Jones v. USA
as 21-10797
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID E. JONES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
