Cases 31 - 40 of 269
Acevedo v. Mercado Santiago, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
Sheila M. Acevedo
Defendant:
Mercado Santiago, Inc. and Enrique Santiago
United States of America v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2022cv23213
Defendant:
Myriam Acevedo, Miriam Acevedo Cabrera, Maria Del Carmen Cabrera and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
ACEVEDO CONSULTING INCORPORATED v. PATEL
as 9:2022cv81496
Plaintiff:
ACEVEDO CONSULTING INCORPORATED
Defendant:
SONAL PATEL
Acevedo et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81382
Plaintiff:
Otilio Acevedo, Ethel Austin, Patricia Beacham and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Kebin Valentin, et al v. 1245, LLC, et al
as 22-12902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEBIN VALENTIN, MATTHEW DAVID VALENTIN and ANABELY ACEVEDO
Defendant / Appellee:
1245, LLC, RMRP REALTY, LLC, RONALD T. FATATO and others
ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15323
Plaintiff:
AARON ACEVEDO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12420
Plaintiff:
JAN CARLOS ACEVEDO and JAN C ACEVEDO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12439
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATRICK ACEVEDO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDINO ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12574
Plaintiff:
XAVIER EUGENIO ANDINO ACEVEDO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ACEVEDO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09553
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D ACEVEDO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
