Cases 31 - 40 of 3,039
AHRENS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY AHRENS, JERRY ANGUIANO, MARTIN CISNEROS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
JASON COLVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv02232
Plaintiff:
DANIEL COLVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waseem Daker v. Therese Barnes, et al
as 21-13801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
THERESE S. BARNES, HAROLD D. MELTON, DAVID ERICH NAHMIAS and others
COLVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67365
Plaintiff:
MARK COLVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66878
Plaintiff:
DANIEL COLVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Colvin v. Too Cool Cafe, LLC et al
as 6:2021cv01688
Plaintiff:
APRIL JOY COLVIN
Defendant:
TOO COOL CAFE, LLC and CHRISTOPHER J. HIERONYMUS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
COLVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60136
Plaintiff:
MANUEL COLVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51975
Plaintiff:
AARON COLVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50956
Plaintiff:
DOSSIE COLVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
