Cases 31 - 40 of 73
Apple Corps Limited et al v. 3 W Store et al
as 0:2018cv60656
Plaintiff:
Apple Corps Limited and Subafilms Limited
Defendant:
3W Store, Shop2960084 Store, Shop3212107 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2018cv80354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Apple Corps Limited et al v. shirtsforyou.net et al
as 0:2018cv60221
Plaintiff:
Apple Corps Limited and Subafilms Limited
Defendant:
B..F Store, Good luck to you, GreenMango Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Randall et al v. Offplan Millionaire AG et al
as 6:2017cv02103
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Randall and Fan Feng
Defendant:
Offplan Millionaire AG, Capinvest LLC, Joachim Oliver Nedela and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Velasquez v. Cate Star, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv22889
Plaintiff:
Miriam Madrid Velasquez
Defendant:
Cate Star, LLC and Ming Feng Zhuo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Gucci America, Inc. v. 1to1handbags.com et al
as 0:2016cv62839
Plaintiff:
Gucci America, Inc.
Defendant:
1to1handbags.com, 2016bagshoeshops.com, 2016eshophandbags.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Li et al v. Walsh, et al
as 9:2016cv81871
Plaintiff:
LAN LI , YING TAN , TAO XIONG and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH WALSH, JOSEPH WALSH, JR., J. MARCUS PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
Zhang et al v. Raymond James & Associates Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv24655
Plaintiff:
Zheng Zhang , Haiyun Hu , Lixia Wang and others
Defendant:
Raymond James & Associates Inc., , Joel Burstein and Ariel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Fu Lin v. U.S. Attorney General
as 15-15531
Petitioner:
FU FENG LIN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
