Cases 41 - 50 of 81
Brett v. Tucker et al
as 0:2016cv60229
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Tucker, Anthony J., Baptist John and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Pierson, III v. Bruce Rogow, et al
as 15-15475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND H. PIERSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE STEPHEN ROGOW, BRUCE S. ROGOW, PA, CYNTHIA GUNTHER and others
Pierson v. Rogow et al
as 0:2015cv61312
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Pierson, III
Defendant:
Bruce S. Rogow, J.D., Bruce S. Rogow, PA, Cynthia Gunther, J.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Weisblat et al v. Honda Motor Co., Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv62669
Plaintiff:
Brooks Weisblat , Kimberly Holmes , Kathy Liberal and others
Defendant:
Honda Motor Co., Inc., Honda Motor Co. Ltd., Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gunther v. Synergetic Communication, Inc.
as 0:2014cv61922
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Gunther
Defendant:
Synergetic Communication, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gunther v. Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
as 0:2014cv61514
Plaintiff:
Shannon D. Gunther
Defendant:
Convergent Outsourcing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Raymond Pierson, III v. Bruce Rogow, J.D., et al
as 14-11722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND H. PIERSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE S. ROGOW, J.D., CYNTHIA GUNTHER and BRUCE S. ROGOW, PA
Pierson v. Bruce S. Rogow, J.D. et. al.
as 0:2014cv60920
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Pierson, III
Defendant:
Bruce S. Rogow, J.D., Bruce S. Rogow, PA, Cynthia Gunther, J.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierson v. Rogow et al
as 0:2014cv60270
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Pierson, III
Defendant:
Bruce S. Rogow, J.D., Cynthia Gunther and Bruce S. Rogow, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ettel v. Fred M. Bush, LLC et al
as 9:2013cv80266
Plaintiff:
Gunther Ettel
Defendant:
Fred M. Bush, LLC and Fred M. Bush
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
