Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HARLAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98097
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN HARLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARLAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98069
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Harlan Decoste
as 20-13771
Defendant / Appellant:
HARLAN DECOSTE, a.k.a. Money King, a.k.a. Moneyking_111
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv65112
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HARLAN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv63611
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HARLAN HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRUX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56384
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHON HARLAN BRUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARLAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv50692
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HARLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARLAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29396
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE HARLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARLAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv14806
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHAD MICHAEL HARLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
