Cases 81 - 90 of 400
JOHNSON v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv82203
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., SANOFI US SERVICES INC, Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
BESSIE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAPPAN v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv82204
Defendant:
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., SANOFI US SERVICES INC, Sandoz, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON TAPPAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DALEY v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv82198
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC, Sanofi S.A., Does 1-100 and others
Plaintiff:
LINDA DALEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANLEY v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv82200
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC, Apotex Corporation, Granules USA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HANLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv82201
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC, Sanofi S.A., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
NORMA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osting v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv82202
Plaintiff:
JOHN OSTING
Defendant:
SANOFI US SERVICES INC, Sanofi S.A., Pfizer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xymogen, Inc. et al v. Feng et al
as 6:2020cv02134
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Patrick Dorvilus, Christopher Mote and others
Plaintiff:
Xymogen, Inc. and Xymogen IP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0044
ROBERSON v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv81808
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Chattem, Inc., SANOFI US SERVICES INC and others
Plaintiff:
SHARON ROBERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAYNE v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv81824
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Dr. Reddys Laboratories, Inc., SANOFI US SERVICES INC and others
Plaintiff:
DELLA LAYNE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETTIT, JR. v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 9:2020cv81806
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., SANOFI US SERVICES INC, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY PETTIT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
