Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Teton Historic Aviation Found, et al v. DOD, et al
as 17-5112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Teton Historic Aviation Foundation and Teton Avjet LLC, doing business as Teton Aviation Center
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Defense and United States of America
Council For Urological Interes v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-5235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Council For Urological Interests
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, In her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Teton Historic Aviation Found, et al v. Department of Defense, et al
as 13-5039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Teton Historic Aviation Foundation and Teton Avjet LLC, doing business as Teton Aviation Center
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Defense and United States of America
Council For Urological Interes v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 11-5030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Council For Urological Interests
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, In her official capacity as acting Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of LA v. USA, et al
as 09-5310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and Secretary of Health and Human Services
Water Qlty Ins v. USA
as 08-5013
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Water Quality Insurance Syndicate
Defendant - Appellant:
United States of America
McCreary, Maurice, et al v. Offner, Paul
as 98-5155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice McCreary, M.D., Massimo A. Righini, M.D. and Medical Society of the District of Columbia, a federally-chartered corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Paul Offner, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Health Care Finance of the District of Columbia Department of Human Services
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
