Cases 11 - 20 of 235
Tuscola Area Airport Authority, et al v. Daniel Elwell
as 19-1153
Petitioner:
Almer Charter Township, Michigan, Eric King, Dale Heinlein and others
Respondent:
Daniel K. Elwell
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Mgmt.
as 17-5232
In Re:
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Travis Arnold, Tony Bachtell and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Adam Dale, Mary C. Woo, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Victor W. Hobbs, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Personnel Management, Kathleen McGettigan, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity, Keypoint Government Solutions, a Delaware corporation and others
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Mgmt.
as 17-5217
In Re:
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Robert Crawford, Adam Dale and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
National Treasury Employees Union, Stephen Howell, John Ortino and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Personnel Management, Beth F. Cobert, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity, Kathleen McGettigan, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity and others
Daniel Barbosa, et al v. DHS, et al
as 17-5206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Barbosa, Luis Barbosa, Ramon Bueno and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security and Federal Emergency Management Agency
Hispanic Affairs Project, et al v. Thomas Perez, et al
as 17-5202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hispanic Affairs Project, Rodolfo Llacua, John Doe, John Doe and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas E. Perez, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Portia Wu, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration, United States Department of Labor and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Western Range Association and Mountain Plains Agricultural Service
National Association for Fixed v. DOL, et al
as 16-5345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
National Association for Fixed Annuities
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Labor and Thomas E. Perez, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor
American Foundry Society, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 16-1137
Petitioner:
American Foundry Society and National Association of Manufacturers
Respondent:
Occupational Safety & Health Administration, United States Department of Labor and Thomas E. Perez, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
American Road and Trans., et al v. OSHA, et al
as 16-1138
Petitioner:
American Road and Transportation Builders Association, American Society of Concrete Contractors, American Subcontractors Association and others
Respondent:
Occupational Safety & Health Administration, United States Department of Labor and Thomas E. Perez, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
Associated Masonry Contractors, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 16-1125
Petitioner:
Associated Masonry Contractors of Texas, d/b/a Texas Masonry Council, Associated Subcontractors Association of Texas, Inc., Distribution Contractors Association and others
Respondent:
Occupational Safety & Health Administration, United States Department of Labor and Thomas E. Perez, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
American Foundry Society Texas, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 16-1126
Petitioner:
American Foundry Society Texas Region 3/Texas Chapter of the American Foundry Society and Texas Association of Business
Respondent:
Occupational Safety & Health Administration, Thomas E. Perez, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
