Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 51 - 60 of 87
Great Lakes Utilities v. FERC
as 08-1389
Petitioner: Great Lakes Utilities, Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Madison Gas and Electric Company and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers and Wisconsin Electric Power Company
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. and Duke Energy Business Services LLC
Duquesne Light Company v. FERC
as 08-1350
Petitioner: Duquesne Light Company
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: FirstEnergy Service Company, Duquesne Industrial Intervenors, Duke Energy Corporation and others
Natl' Rural Elec. Coop Assoc. v. FERC
as 08-1278
Petitioner: National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Transmission Dependent Utility Systems and East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Edison Electric Institute, Entergy Services, Inc., New York Independent System Operator, Inc. and others
Jackson County, North Carolina v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1224
Petitioner: Jackson County, North Carolina, Town of Franklin, North Carolina and The Friends of Lake Glenville Association, Incorporated
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC and United States Department of the Interior
Richard Blumenthal v. FERC
as 08-1216
Petitioner: Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General for the State of Connecticut, Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois and Patrick Lynch, Attorney General of the State of Rhode Island
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner: American Public Power Association, Coalition of Midwest Transmission Customers, Deseret Generation & Transmission Co-operative, Inc. and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Duke Energy Corporation, Lower Mount Bethel Energy, LLC, PPL Brunner Island, LLC and others
American Public Power Associat v. FERC
as 08-1077
Petitioner: American Public Power Association, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, Transmission Access Policy Study Group and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: California Independent System Operator Corporation, Duke Energy Corporation, Edison Electric Institute and others
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., Northeast Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., Sam Rayburn G&T Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
E ON US v. FERC
as 08-1079
Petitioner: E.ON U.S. LLC
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Duke Energy Corporation
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Edison Electric Institute and New York Independent System Operator, Incorporated
Ameren Services Company, et al v. FERC
as 07-1141
Petitioner: Ameren Services Company, Central Illinois Light Company, doing business as AmerenCILCO, Ameren Illinois Company and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: Duke Energy Shared Services, Inc., CAM Energy Trading, LLC, SESCO Enterprises, LLC and others
DC Energy Midwest, LLC, et al v. FERC
as 06-1423
Petitioner: DC Energy Midwest, LLC
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor: Duke Energy Shared Services, Inc., SESCO Enterprises, LLC, EPIC Merchant Energy LP and others
Amer Radio Relay v. FCC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1343
Petitioner: American Radio Relay League, Incorporated
Respondent: Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor: CURRENT Technologies, LLC, Duke Energy Corporation, Utilities Telecom Council and others
Intervenor For Petitioner: National Association of Broadcasters and Association for Maximum Service Television, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?