Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Cases 71 - 80 of 95
General Electric Company v. Lisa Jackson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-5092
Plaintiff - Appellant: General Electric Company
Defendant - Appellee: Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and National Association of Manufacturers
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Natural Resources Defense Council, Riverkeeper, Inc. and others
Public Citizen v. FMCSA
as 09-1094
Petitioner: Public Citizen, Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, Truck Safety Coalition and others
Respondent: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Intervenor For Petitioner: William B. Trescott
Intervenor For Respondent: American Trucking Associations, Inc., Health & Personal Care Logistics Conference, Inc., NASSTRAC, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: Center for Science in the Public Interest, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, OMB Watch and others
Natl' Assoc. of Home Builders v. OSHA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1053
Petitioner: National Association of Home Builders, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and National Association of Manufacturers
Respondent: Occupational Safety & Health Administration and Department of Labor
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: AFL-CIO and Building and Construction Trades Department, AFL-CIO
Sierra Club v. EPA
as 09-1018
Petitioner: Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council and Environmental Defense Fund
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator and Lisa Perez Jackson, Administrator
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner: Indiana Wildlife Federation, Michigan Environmental Council and Ohio Environmental Council
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent: Utility Air Regulatory Group, Deseret Power Electric Cooperative, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
State of California v. EPA
as 08-1178
Petitioner: State of California, by and through Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor of the State of California, the California Air Resources Board, and Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General of the State of California
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Petitioner: South Coast Air Quality Management District
Intervenor For Respondent: Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, Inc. and National Automobile Dealers Association
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Michael A. Cox, Michigan Attorney General, American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
State of New York v. EPA
as 08-1179
Petitioner: State of New York, State of Arizona, State of Connecticut and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor For Respondent: Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and National Automobile Dealers Association
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Utility Air Regulatory Group
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: City of Sacramento
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent: John Campbell, United States Representative
Natural Resources Defense Coun, et al v. EPA, et al
as 08-1180
Petitioner: Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Stephen L. Johnson, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: American Petroleum Institute, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Utility Air Regulatory Group
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), National Association of Counties, National League of Cities and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: City of Sacramento
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent: John Campbell, United States Representative
Eugene Newspaper Guild, CWA v. NLRB
as 08-1006
Petitioner: Eugene Newspaper Guild, CWA Local 37194, AFL-CIO
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor For Respondent: Guard Publishing Company
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: HR Policy Association, Society for Human Resource Management, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
FedEx Home Delivery v. NLRB We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1391
Petitioner: FedEx Home Delivery, A Separate Operating Division of FedEx Ground Package System, Incorporated
Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor For Respondent: International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local No. 25
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: American Trucking Associations, Inc. and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Allied Educational Foundation, United States Business and Industry Council and Washington Legal Foundation
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent: National Employment Lawyers Association and National Employment Law Project
Pharma Care Assn v. DC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-7062
Plaintiff - Appellant: Pharmaceutical Care Management Association
Defendant - Appellee: District of Columbia and Adrian Fenty, in his official capacity as Mayor of the District of Columbia
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: American Association of Retired Persons, Legal Counsel for the Elderly, Inc. and Prescription Access Litigation (PAL) Project
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: America's Health Insurance Plans and Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?