Cases 1 - 6 of 6
RMS of Georgia, LLC v. EPA, et al
as 23-1104
Petitioner:
RMS of Georgia, LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
FluoroFusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc.
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1353
Petitioner:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc., White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc., doing business as PCS Phosphate-White Springs and PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, LP
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
All Plaintiffs, et al v. BNSF Railway Company, et al
as 09-7023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dakota Granite Company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, McIntyre Group, Ltd., GVL Pipe & Demolition, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fayus Enterprises, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Agway Liquidating Trust, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and Maroon Incorporated, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Appellee:
Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - MDL No. 1869
Penick Corp Inc v. DEA
as 06-1105
Petitioner:
Penick Corporation, Inc.
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Intervenor For Respondent:
Chattem Chemicals, Inc.
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Mallinckrodt, Inc.
Honeywell Intl Inc v. EPA
as 02-1294
Petitioner:
Honeywell International, Inc.
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
ATOFINA Chemicals, Inc.
Terminated Party:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Stepan Company and Vulcan Materials Company
MD Pharm Inc v. DEA
as 96-1256
Petitioner:
MD Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Intervenor For Respondent:
Mallinckrodt Chemical, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
