Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Keren Kayemeth Leisrael - Jewish National Fund, et al v. Education for a Just Peace in the Middle East
as 21-7097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keren Kayemeth Leisrael - Jewish National Fund, Asher Goodman, Batsheva Goodman and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Education for a Just Peace in the Middle East, doing business as US Campaign for Palestinian Rights
M. D. C., et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-5347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Y. O. T., D. P. R., G. G. L., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellee:
William Pelham Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, James McHenry, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, Andrew Davidson, in his official capacity as USCIS Asylum Office Division Chief and others
Transmission Agency of N. Cali, et al v. FERC
as 15-1241
Petitioner:
Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation District, City of Redding, California and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Transmission Agency, et al v. FERC
as 15-1057
Petitioner:
Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation District, City of Santa Clara, California and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, M-S-R Public Power Agency, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Sacramento Municipal Utility D v. FERC
as 12-1276
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor:
City of Santa Clara, California, M-S-R Public Power Agency and Transmission Agency of Northern California
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
American Public Power Association
Sacramento Municipal Utility D v. FERC
as 09-1142
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, also known as SMUD
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
M-S-R Public Power Agency, Modesto Irrigation District, City of Santa Clara, California, doing business as Silicon Valley Power and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, DC Energy, LLC and Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Sacramento Municipal Utility D v. FERC
as 09-1141
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Modesto Irrigation District, City of Santa Clara, California, Transmission Agency of Northern California and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, DC Energy, LLC and Transmission Access Policy Study Group
Sacramento Municip. Util. Dist v. FERC
as 07-1208
Petitioner:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, Independent Energy Producers Association, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
City and County of San Francisco, California, Transmission Agency of Northern California, Modesto Irrigation District and others
Transm Agcy No CA, et al v. FERC
as 05-1402
Petitioner:
Transmission Agency of Northern California, City of Santa Clara, California, City of Redding, California and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Southern California Edison Company, California Electricity Oversight Board, California Independent System Operator Corporation and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
California Power Agency and Northern California Power Agency
We Area Power Admin v. FERC
as 04-1090
Petitioner:
Western Area Power Administration
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Southern California Edison Company, California Electricity Oversight Board, California Independent System Operator Corporation and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
