Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Sheet Metal #15 v. NLRB
as 06-1028
Petitioner:
Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local 15, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor:
Energy Air, Inc. and Galencare, Inc., doing business as Brandon Regional Medical Center
Amicus Curiae:
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. and Greenpeace USA
Sheet Metal Wrkrs v. NLRB
as 07-1479
Petitioner:
Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local 270, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor For Respondent:
Oil Capitol Sheet Metal, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc.
Sheet Metal #15 v. NLRB
as 06-1028
Petitioner:
Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local 15, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor For Respondent:
Energy Air, Inc.
Intervenor:
Galencare, Inc., doing business as Brandon Regional Medical Center
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Greenpeace USA
Hartline, Robert E., et al v. Sheet Metal Workers, et al
as 01-7078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert E. Hartline, Eugene Hintz, Ronald W. McCarthy and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, Matthew B. Hernandez and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Sheet Metal Workers International Association
Tradesmen Intl v. NLRB
as 00-1523
Petitioner:
Tradesmen International, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor:
Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, Local Union No. 33 of Northern Ohio, AFL-CIO
:
and
Randell Warehse AZ v. NLRB
as 00-1155
Petitioner:
Randell Warehouse of Arizona, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor For Respondent:
Sheet Metal Workers International Association, Local #359
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Council on Labor Law Equality
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
