Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Darrell Wilcox, et al v. Georgetown University, et al
as 23-7059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Wilcox and Michael McGuire, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries in and on behalf of the Georgetown University Defined Contribution Retirement Plan, the Georgetown University Voluntary Contribution Retirement Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
Georgetown University, Christopher Augostini and Geoff Chatas
Darrell Wilcox, et al v. Georgetown University, et al
as 19-7065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Wilcox, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries in and on behalf of the Georgetown University Defined Contribution Retirement Plan, the Georgetown University Voluntary Contribution Retirement Plan and Michael Mcguire, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries in and on behalf of the Georgetown University Defined Contribution Retirement Plan, the Georgetown University Voluntary Contribution Retirement Plan
Defendant / Appellee:
Geoff Chatas, Christopher Augostini and Georgetown University
Christopher Stoller v. OCWEN Financial Corporation, et al
as 16-7140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant - Appellee:
OCWEN Financial Corporation, William C. Erbey, Ronald Faris and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae:
Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
In re: In The Matter of the Fort v. WMATA
as 13-7129
In Re:
In re: In The Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising out of the Events of June 22, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Davonne Flanagan, Dawn Flanagan, Imhotep Yakub and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and WPCompany, LLC, doing business as Was, doing business as The Washington Post
Defendant - Appellant:
Arinc, Inc. and Alstom Signaling, Inc.
In re: Fort Totten Metrorail Cases, et al v. WMATA, et al
as 12-7008
In Re:
In re: In The Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising out of the Events of June 22, 2009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Davonne Flanagan, Dawn Flanagan, Imhotep Yakub and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oscar O. Flores, Individually and on behalf of the Estate of Ana Graciela Argentina Fernandez Bautista, dec'd; and on behalf of Jackelyn Fernandez Flores, minor child of Ana Graciela Argentina Fernandez Bautista, dec'd
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Arinc, Inc.
Love, Rosemary, et al v. Johanns, Michael, et al
as 04-5449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rosemary Love, Lind Marie Bara-Weaver, Margaret Odom and others
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Ann M. Veneman
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael O. Johanns
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
National Women's Law Center, National Partnership for Women & Families, Impact Fund and others
Shook, Karen, et al v. DC Fincl Respsble
as 97-7087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Karen Shook, Benjamin Bonham, Sandra Butler-Truesdale and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Childs, Rev. and Wilma R. Harvey
Defendant - Appellee:
D.C. Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Authority
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Missionary Baptist Ministers Conference for Washington D.C. and Vicinity, District of Columbia Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, Coalition for Political and Financial Accountability and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
