Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01988
Plaintiff:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
THC AFFORDABLE HOUSING, INC. et al v. EAGLE POINT MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03571
Defendant:
EAGLE POINT MANAGEMENT, LLC and EAGLE POINT PARTNERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
WEBSTER GARDENS, LP, FORT VIEW, LP, PARTNER ARMS 4, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION v. ZINKE et al
as 1:2017cv00954
Defendant:
RYAN ZINKE, MICHAEL S. BLACK and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv00678
Plaintiff:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Defendant:
XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY , GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY and XL REINSURANCE AMERICA, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv00515
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Defendant:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv01602
Plaintiff:
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and YVETTE ROUBIDEAUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HIRSCHFELD INDUSTRIES BRIDGE, LLC
as 1:2012cv01945
Plaintiff:
HIRSCHFELD INDUSTRIES BRIDGE, LLC
Defendant:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION v. JOHN C. GRIMBERG COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2009cv00869
Plaintiff:
FORT MYER CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
Defendant:
JOHN C. GRIMBERG COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
