Cases 61 - 70 of 1,876
ALI et al v. AL-NAHYAN et al
as 1:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
AMIN ALLAWI ALI, AYMAN MHAMAD SALEH AL SANABANI, KHALED ALI SALEM CHAID and others
Defendant:
MOHAMED BEN ZAYED AL-NAHYAN, MOHAMMED BIN RASHID AL MAKTOUM, MOHAMED BIN SALMAN AL SAOUD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
THOMPSON v. SAFEWAY, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv01995
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thompson
Defendant:
SAFEWAY/ALBERSONS CO., WOLF PROFESSIONAL SECURITY, INC., Unknown Security Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abdul Mohammed v. Christopher Cooper, et al
as 23-5167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Abdul Azeem Mohammed
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher R. Cooper, Beryl A. Howell, James E. Boasberg and others
DARDEN v. PEARSON et al
as 1:2023cv02185
Plaintiff:
TARIA DASHAWN DARDEN
Defendant:
LILLIAN GLADYS PEARSON and WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
MORRIS et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2023cv01941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MORRIS, JESSE URENA, BRIANNE CROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
HALL v. BIDEN
as 1:2023cv02290
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HALL v. HARRIS
as 1:2023cv02289
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
KAMALA HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
HALL v. U.S. POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE
as 1:2023cv02189
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
U.S. POSTAL INSPECTION SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
HALL v. WRAY
as 1:2023cv01909
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MCCOYIE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
as 1:2023cv02064
Plaintiff:
HARVEY MCCOYIE
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
