Cases 1 - 10 of 1,884
FAKHRAVAR v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv01760
Plaintiff:
AMIR FAKHRAVAR
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
LEONARD v. ARAMARK EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2024cv01747
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEONARD
Defendant:
ARAMARK EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT and AARON BABBITT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
PILLA v. AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv01717
Plaintiff:
NAOMI PRASAD PILLA
Defendant:
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC., AVA NOMA CONDOMINIUM and ARCHSTONE NORTH CAPITOL HILL 2 LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DiLELLA et al v. BURCHARD et al
as 1:2024cv01675
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M DILELLA and FRANK GIORDANO
Defendant:
RENEE BURCHARD, KIRSTI GARLOCK, ANNA LAYMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hdeel Abdelhady v. George Washington University, et al
as 24-7090
Plaintiff:
Hdeel Abdelhady
Defendant:
George Washington University, PMA Management Corporation, Aramark Services, Inc. and others
LINGLE v. GUNWYN/LANSBURGH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
as 1:2024cv01514
Plaintiff:
LINDA LINGLE
Defendant:
GUNWYN/LANSBURGH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
SHARP v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, BOARD OF APPEALS
as 1:2024cv01345
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY A. SHARP
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS, BOARD OF APPEALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
DOE v. ISLAMIC REPBULIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
