Cases 1 - 10 of 236
NWOSU v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv01852
Plaintiff:
ADAEZE NWOSU
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY INC., ANA C. REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv01701
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ASHLI BABBITT and AARON BABBITT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
BARREIRO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
NIURKA BARREIRO and RUBEN MURO SUAREZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Teresita Canuto v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5068
Plaintiff:
Teresita A. Canuto
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Attorney's Office
Christopher Buie v. USA
as 24-5057
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Buie
Defendant:
United States of America
GARCIA-REFOUR v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
sarana garcia-refour
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
KAVANAGH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03503
Plaintiff:
ISABELLA KAVANAGH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
PENN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2023cv02693
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEVON PENN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
KHLOEUNG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02463
Plaintiff:
VUTHNY KHLOEUNG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
AKBAR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02382
Plaintiff:
SYED AKBAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
