Cases 51 - 60 of 63
SCOLLICK v. NARULA et al
as 1:2014cv01339
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SCOLLICK
Defendant:
NEIL PAREKH , AMAR GOGIA , CSG, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SPECIALTY HOSPITALS OF AMERICA, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SPECIALTY HOSPITALS OF AMERICA, LLC, SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF WASHINGTON-HADLEY, LLC, SHA MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
NAPOLIELLO vs. HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
DAVID NAPOLIELLO
Defendant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES INC
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
ROACH v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. ROACH
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
CONNORS v. BTG INTERNATIONAL LIMITED et al
as 1:2014cv00387
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
BANK OF AMERICA v. MAUCHA et al
as 1:2013cv01826
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PAUL MAUCHA, RODERICK BLAIR and JAMES CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
KEAVENEY et al v. SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00855
Plaintiff:
KEVIN KEAVENEY and MARGOT BRENNAN
Defendant:
SRA INTERNATIONAL, INC. , SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND APPLICATION CORPORATION and TRITON SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GIGA, INC.
as 1:2013cv00771
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GIGA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
GREER v. DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00326
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
HOSCH v. BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2013cv00146
Defendant:
BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS V. HOSCH
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
