Cases 1 - 5 of 5
ALCOA CORPORATION et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
INTALCO ALUMINUM, LLC, NORTHWEST ALLOYS, INC., ALUMAX MILL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
TROPICANA PRODUCTS, INC. et al v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00272
Plaintiff:
FRITO-LAY, INC., BOTTLING GROUP, LLC and TROPICANA PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. L.B. FOSTER COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv02115
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY and PORTEC RAIL PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
All Plaintiffs, et al v. BNSF Railway Company, et al
as 09-7023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Dakota Granite Company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, McIntyre Group, Ltd., GVL Pipe & Demolition, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fayus Enterprises, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Agway Liquidating Trust, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and Maroon Incorporated, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Appellee:
Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - MDL No. 1869
RB RUBBER PRODUCTS, INC. v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2007cv02263
Plaintiff:
RB RUBBER PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
