Banks and Banking Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Vincent Roggio v. FDIC
as 24-5134
Plaintiff: Vincent Roggio
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its capacity as Receiver for and on behalf of Washington Mutual Bank, a failed banking institution, and in its corporate capacity
CITY OF NEW YORK v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff: CITY OF NEW YORK
Not Yet Classified: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR FIRST REPUBLIC BANK
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
CITY OF NEW YORK v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR SILICON VALLEY BANK
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff: CITY OF NEW YORK
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR SILICON VALLEY BANK
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
CAIRES v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00957
Plaintiff: RICHARD CAIRES
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
ADAMS v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01977
Plaintiff: ROBERT L. ADAMS
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Deutsche Bank National Trust v. FDIC, et al
as 15-5326
Plaintiff - Appellant: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Trusts
Defendant - Appellee: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its capacity as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation
Deutsche Bank National Trust v. FDIC, et al
as 15-5322
Plaintiff - Appellee: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Trusts
Defendant - Appellant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its capacity as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank
Defendant - Appellee: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association and Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation
AVERY v. FDIC AS RECEIVER FOR NETBANK BUSINESS FINANCE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00150
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: WILLIAM AVERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al
as 13-5248
Plaintiff - Appellee: State National Bank of Big Spring, 60 Plus Association, Inc. and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Plaintiff - Appellant: State of South Carolina, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jacob J. Lew, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Treasury and ex officio Chairman of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, United States Department of the Treasury, Richard Cordray, In his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in his official capacity as ex officio Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and in his official capacity as ex officio member of the Finan and others
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5247
Plaintiff - Appellant: State National Bank of Big Spring, 60 Plus Association, Inc. and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of South Carolina, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jacob J. Lew, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury, Richard Cordray, In his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in his official capacity as ex officio Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and in his official capacity as ex officio member of the Finan and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?