Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BAPTISTE v. VOX MEDIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02161
Plaintiff:
AMBER BAPTISTE
Defendant:
VOX MEDIA, INC., SEQUOIA CAPITAL, MICHAEL LEWIS GOGUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CORTEZ v. BIDEN
as 1:2020cv00105
Defendant:
ROBERT HUNTER BIDEN, ROBERT SCOTT, SARA ALMALIK and others
Plaintiff:
DARLENE CORTEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POSEY et al v. FRIEDMAN
as 1:2012cv01953
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE POSEY, TOBIN DOYLE and DAVID SCOTT POSEY
Defendant:
SCOTT M. FRIEDMAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DYDZAK v. SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BRODY v. JK MOVING & STORAGE INC et al
as 1:2009cv01588
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD L. BRODY
Defendant:
JK MOVING & STORAGE INC, CHARLES SANFORD KUHN, DAVID HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Saleh v. Titan Corporation
as 08-7008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Saleh, An individual, Ahmed Shehab Ahmed, An individual residing in Iraq, Ismael Neisef Jassem Al-Nidawi, An individual residing in Iraq and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CACI International Inc., a Delaware Corporation, CACI Premier Technology, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Titan Corporation
Intervenor For Appellant:
CACI International Inc. and CACI Premier Technology, Inc.
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Professional Services Council
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Human Rights Watch, Physicians for Human Rights, The Center For Victims Of Torture and others
Wallace, Katherine v. Skadden Arps Slate, et al
as 03-7026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Katherine T. Wallace
Defendant - Appellee:
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
