Cases 81 - 90 of 204
Jasper Washington, Jr. v. AlliedBarton Security Service
as 16-7147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jasper Washington, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
AlliedBarton Security Services, LLC
SIMMONS v. EDWARDS et al
as 1:2016cv02311
Plaintiff:
VIVIAN SIMMONS
Defendant:
YOLANDA ANWAR and ROBERT EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
TATE v. NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION LOCAL 305 et al
as 1:2016cv02021
Plaintiff:
CHRIS TATE
Defendant:
NATIONAL POSTAL MAIL HANDLERS UNION LOCAL 305 and FELANDRIA JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
JOHNSON v. LOCAL LODGE 1759, IAMAW et al
as 1:2016cv01893
Defendant:
LOCAL LODGE 1759, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO and ALLIED AVIATION SERVICES
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101
Richard Malloy v. WMATA, et al
as 16-7092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Malloy
Defendant - Appellee:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ v. TRINITY II CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv01440
Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ
Defendant:
TRINITY II CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
WASHINGTON, JR. v. ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2016cv01283
Plaintiff:
JASPER WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7101
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. GIBBS CONTRACTING, INC.
as 1:2016mc01297
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
GIBBS CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
ACEVEDO v. PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 1:2016cv00993
Plaintiff:
MARINA ACEVEDO
Defendant:
PRITCHARD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0187
Theodore Berry v. Coastal International Securit
as 16-7043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Theodore Berry
Defendant - Appellee:
Coastal International Security, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
