Cases 101 - 110 of 245
CFA INSTITUTE v. ANDRE
as 1:2014cv00320
Plaintiff:
CFA INSTITUTE
Defendant:
ANTOINE ANDRE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, INC. v. SCIENCELAB.COM, INC.
as 1:2013cv01952
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, INC.
Defendant:
SCIENCELAB.COM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
SOFT SERVE, INC. v. SPRINKLES CUPCAKES, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01782
Plaintiff:
SOFT SERVE, INC.
Defendant:
SPRINKLES CUPCAKES, LLC and SPRINKLES CUPCAKES DC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
US LEGALIZATION INC. v. US QUICK LEGALIZATION LLC
as 1:2013cv01733
Plaintiff:
US LEGALIZATION INC.
Defendant:
US QUICK LEGALIZATION LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
WISH LLC v. WASHINGTON INTERN HOUSING NETWORK, LLC
as 1:2013cv01641
Plaintiff:
WISH LLC
Defendant:
WASHINGTON INTERN HOUSING NETWORK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. v. VARIOUS JOHN & JANE DOES, et al
as 1:2013cv01039
Plaintiff:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC.
Defendant:
CLINTON BERNARD, ROUGUILON HENDRICKS, MARCUS ANTHONY WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. v. FRASIER
as 1:2013cv00984
Plaintiff:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC.
Defendant:
TERRY L. FRASIER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC. v. BIVINS et al
as 1:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
DELTA SIGMA THETA SORORITY, INC.
Defendant:
LETISHA D. BIVINS, ALPHONSO D. GOINS and FRATHOUSE CLOTHING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
GREEN, ET AL. V. MASON, ET AL.
as 1:2013cv00664
Plaintiff:
KING RAYMOND GREEN , HAROLD WINLEY and ORIGINAL CLOVERS FEATURING HAROLD WINLEY
Defendant:
JOHNNY MASON, CHARLES R. STEVENS and CLOVERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
AARP v. SYCLE
as 1:2013cv00608
Plaintiff:
AARP
Defendant:
MICHAEL SYCLE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
