Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
JACKSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01554
Plaintiff: MICHAEL NOLAN JACKSON
Defendant: KILOLO J. KIJAKAZI
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CAMERON v. KIJAKAZI We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00465
Plaintiff: MICHAEL CAMERON
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARRLAND, KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MATTHEW M. GRAVES
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LOMAX et al v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00055
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: MICHAEL LOMAX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROSSMANN v. TRUMP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00020
Plaintiff: BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant: DONALD TRUMP, NANCY BERRYHILL, ASHEESH AGARWAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ROY v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv01080
Plaintiff: ISAIAH KENNETH ROY
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DAVIS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff: JOANN DAVIS
Defendant: MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WISE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01752
Plaintiff: CONNELL WISE
Defendant: MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01620
Plaintiff: TOWANA SMITH
Defendant: MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WHITE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01595
Plaintiff: KEYANA WHITE
Defendant: MICHAEL JAMES ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ROBINSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01173
Plaintiff: NADINE D. ROBINSON
Defendant: MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?