Cases 11 - 20 of 780
CURNE v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2023cv03789
Plaintiff:
JARRELL DEANDRE CURNE
Defendant:
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, MERRICK GARLAND, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03651
Plaintiff:
ROCHELE MAIA SANTINO and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and John M. Allen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
THOMAS v. SHEEHY NISSAN OF WALDORF
as 1:2023cv03479
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. THOMAS
Defendant:
SHEEHY NISSAN OF WALDORF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WADE v. AHUJA
as 1:2023cv03262
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY WADE
Defendant:
KIRAN AHUJA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MPOY v. JOHN BURST et al
as 1:2023cv03027
Plaintiff:
BRUNO K. MPOY
Defendant:
JOHN BURST, DONIELLE POWE and MURIEL BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv02997
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
DOE v. BURNS et al
as 1:2023cv02937
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. BURNS, DOUG VAN ZANDT, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
EMIABATA v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv02857
Plaintiff:
PHILIP EMIABATA
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, 4. AVAIL., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SEC v. Covington & Burling, LLP
as 23-5212
Petitioner:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Respondent / Appellee:
Covington & Burling, LLP
Intervenor:
John Doe
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv02746
Petitioner:
JOHN MUSSINGTON, JACKLYN FRANK and LESLIE THOMAS KC
Respondent:
DEBORAH BROSNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
