Cases 281 - 290 of 11,554
SHAH v. HOWELL
as 1:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
SYED ZAHEER SHAH
Defendant:
JAYNE A. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WADE v. AHUJA
as 1:2023cv03262
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY WADE
Defendant:
KIRAN AHUJA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2023ml02126
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2023ml02127
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CHAN v. MAY
as 1:2023cv03248
Plaintiff:
WING TING CHAN
Defendant:
GREGORY MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR DRUG TRAFFICKING INVESTIGATION
as 1:2023ml02103
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR DRUG TRAFFICKING INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AKINKUOTU
as 1:2023mc00112
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MECHILLE AKINKUOTU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
YILMAZ v. EADEH
as 1:2023cv03193
Plaintiff:
MEHMET YILMAZ
Defendant:
JULIE A. EADEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv03195
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Mechille Akinkuotu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
F.C.C. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
F.C.C.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
