Cases 21 - 30 of 184
BARTH v. UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv00955
Plaintiff:
JOHN S. BARTH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPT. OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUR. OF INVESTIGATION, HOMELAND SEC. INVESTIGATIONS. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
CHANG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
WEIH STEVE CHANG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, JOHN DEMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DOE v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2022mc00007
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
John Barth v. United States, et al
as 22-5007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John S. Barth
Defendant / Appellee:
United States, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
DOE v. SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
AMAZON.COM, INC. et al v. WDC HOLDINGS LLC et al
as 1:2021mc00153
Receiver:
MARK A. ROBERTS
Plaintiff:
AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON DATA SERVICES, INC.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
800 HOYTLLC
Defendant:
WDC HOLDINGS LLC doing business as NORTHSTAR COMMERCIAL PARTNERS, BRIAN WATSON, STERLING NCP FF, LLC and others
Interpleader:
WDC HOLDINGS, LLC, PLW CAPITAL I, LLC and BW HOLDINGS, LLC
TRUDEL v. DILMORE et al
as 1:2021cv03162
Defendant:
HUGH DAVID O'DONNELL, WYNN ANDREW HARDING, PHYLLIS ARMATROUT WONG and others
Plaintiff:
MARY TRUDEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2021cv02954
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BREWER v. WRAY et al
as 1:2021cv02671
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER WRAY, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JANET YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
