Cases 21 - 30 of 52
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC. v. JEWELL et al
as 1:2014cv00065
Defendant:
S. M. R. JEWELL, GEOFFRY GIBSON, GREGORY J. GOULD and others
Plaintiff:
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF THE CHUKCHANSI INDIANS v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2013cv00411
Defendant:
TRACIE STEVENS , JO-ANNE SHYLOSKI , MARIA GETOFF and others
Plaintiff:
PICAYUNE RANCHERIA OF THE CHUKCHANSI INDIANS , DIXIE JACKSON , HAROLD HAMMOND, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 2701 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
USA v. Philip Morris USA Inc., et al
as 13-5028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Philip Morris USA Inc., Formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, directly and as successor by merger to AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
American Tobacco Company, Directly and as Successor to the tobacco interest of AMERICAN BRANDS, INC., British American Tobacco., P.L.C., Directly and as Successor to B.A.T. INDUSTRIES P.L.C., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Directly and as Successor to BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, LTD and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
Smithkline Beecham Corp., doing business as GlaxoSmithKline, GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, L.P., Pharmacia Corporation and others
JOYNER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01610
Plaintiff:
DERRAN JOYNER , BETTY WYATT , M. W. and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
PEAVEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv00691
Plaintiff:
MORRIS J. PEAVEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN MCHUGES, E. SHESKNI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard Levi v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co, et al
as 12-7033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bernard Sheldon Levi, Personal Representative and interested heir on behalf of the deceased Mrs. Julia Ellen Waring and other interest heirs of the deceased Ellen Waring, Maureen Waring and Darlene Levi, Sisters
Defendant - Appellee:
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Individually and as successor in interest to the American Tobacco Co., American Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and others
In re: Special Proceeding
as 12-5062
In Re:
In re: Special Proceedings
Interested Party - Appellee:
Henry Federick Schuelke, III, Joseph W. Bottini, James A. Goeke and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
Edward L. Sullivan
JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00303
Plaintiff:
MORRIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Hussain Kareem v. FDIC, et al
as 11-5277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Hussain Kareem
Defendant - Appellee:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Johnson & Freedman II, LLC, doing business as Morris, Schneider, Prior, Freedman & Johnson, Llc
USA v. Philip Morris USA Inc., et al
as 11-5146
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Philip Morris USA Inc., Formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Directly and as successor by merger to AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
American Tobacco Company, Directly and as Successor to the tobacco interest of AMERICAN BRANDS, INC., British American Tobacco, P.L.C., Directly and as Successor to B.A.T. INDUSTRIES P.L.C., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Directly and as Successor to BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, LTD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
