Other Statutory Actions Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 124
HARNEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2016cv02400
Plaintiff: HARNEY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR , SALLY JEWELL , BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Stand Up For California!, et al v. DOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant: Stand Up For California!, Randall Brannon, Madera Ministerial Association and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Stand Up For California!, et al v. DOI, et al
as 16-5328
Plaintiff - Appellee: Stand Up For California!, Randall Brannon, Madera Ministerial Association and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians
Butte County, California v. Jonodev Chaudhuri, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5240
Plaintiff - Appellant: Butte County, California
Defendant - Appellee: Jonodev Osceola Chaudhuri, Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission, E. Sequoyah Simermeyer, Commissioner, National Indian Gaming Commission, Sally Jewell, Secretary, United Stated Department of the Interior and others
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee: Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria, California, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
NAKAI v. JEWELL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01500
Plaintiff: HEATHER MCMILLAN NAKAI
Defendant: S. M. R. JEWELL, LAWRENCE ROBERTS, BRUCE MAYTUBBY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Navajo Nation v. DOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5117
Plaintiff - Appellant: Navajo Nation, a federally recognized Indian tribe, Navajo Nation Department of Justice
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of the Interior and Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of the Interior
Amador County, California v. DOI, et al
as 16-5082
Plaintiff - Appellant: Amador County, California
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of the Interior, Sally Jewell, Secretary of the Department of the Interior and Lawrence S. Roberts, Acting Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs of the United States Department of the Interior
National Mall Tours of Washin v. DOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-5080
Plaintiff - Appellant: National Mall Tours of Washington, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Sally Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior and others
Intervenor - Appellee: City Sightseeing Washington DC, Inc., Third-Party Intervenor, d/b/a Big Bus Tours
NAVAJO NATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00011
Plaintiff: NAVAJO NATION
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and SALLY JEWELL
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
NAVAJO NATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2016cv00012
Plaintiff: NAVAJO NATION
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, SALLY JEWELL, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?