Cases 71 - 80 of 9,852
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv01065
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Muhumed Osman and NO PARTY
Defendant:
VINCENT SPERA, HEATHER MERRITT, RIAN HARKER HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR A FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00651
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONER'S APPOINTMENT FOR A FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
MONICA CAMILA ORTIZ PAI, LUCAS EDWARD MURPHY and NO PARTY
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MATTHEW M. GRAVES
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
as 1:2024ml00579
Not Yet Classified:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR ORDER FOR COMMISSIONERS APPOINTMENT FOR FRAUD INVESTIGATION
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OM v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
GEORGIA OM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
IN RE TYLER TEW
as 1:2024mc00029
Not Yet Classified:
TYLER JOHN TEW
Interested Party:
PRESS COALITION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CHAUDHARI et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
NARAYANBHAI CHAUDHARI and PRIYANK CHAUDHARI
Defendant:
ANTHONY BLINKEN and UR JADDOU
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
ENDO PAR INNOVATION COMPANY, LLC, PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.,, PAR STERILE PRODUCTS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SU v. NAJAFE LLC
as 1:2024mc00027
Petitioner:
JULIE SU
Respondent:
NAJAFE LLC doing business as CITY SLIDERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
