Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MCCARTHY v. JOHNSON
as 1:2021mc00004
Defendant:
MICHAEL HEATH JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
HELEN DIANE MCCARTHY
WISE et al v. BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN et al
as 1:2019cv00995
Plaintiff:
BILLY DOAL WELLS, D.J.H., LOLA JEAN MODJESKA and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY, BANK MARKAZI JOMHOURI ISLAMI IRAN and BANK MELLI IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
LEE et al v. IRAN
as 1:2019cv00830
Plaintiff:
BILLY DOAL WELLS, D.J.H., LOLA JEAN MODJESKA and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
SUN v. OBAMA BARACK-DOG et al
as 1:2017cv01861
Plaintiff:
XIU JIAN SUN
Defendant:
OBAMA BARACK-DOG, P. DAVIS OLIVER, BENJAMIN C. MIZER and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
Peter Atherton v. Sally Jewell, et al
as 16-5247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Peter James Atherton
Defendant - Appellee:
Sally Jewell, Secretary, Department of Interior, Individual and Official Capacity, Robert Maclean, United States Park Police, Police Chief, Veranelli, Sergeant and others
USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc., et al
as 14-7094
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Todd Heath, State of California, Attorney General's Office; California Department of Justice. ex rel. Todd Heath, State of Delaware, Department of Justice; Attorney General's Office, ex rel. Todd Heath and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Heath
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T, Inc., AT&T Corp., doing business as AT&T Advanced Solutions, AT&T Datacomm, Inc., doing business as AT&T Datacomm and others
HEATH et al v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01897
Plaintiff:
TODD HEATH , STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. , AT&T CORP. , AT&T DATACOMM, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY v. THOMAS
as 1:2011mc00454
Petitioner:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Respondent:
HEATH P. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: MS:NoticeR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
