Cases 1 - 10 of 82
COLBERT v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al.
as 1:2013cv01137
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
PEARSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2012cv01737
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE PEARSON , J. P. , CLEO MOSLEY and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
PROPHET et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
SANDRA PROPHET , C. P. , LANITA LOGAN and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
CHAVEZ et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
ANA CHAVEZ , KATHY CANNON , ROBIN BELL and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
THOMPSON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
GWEN THOMPSON , K.M. , BETTY WYATT and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
COLBERT v. CINCINNATI POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2011cv02250
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant:
CINCINNATI POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL'S OFFICE, OHIO CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLBERT v. INDIANA GAMING COMMISSION AND ATHLETIC DIVISION
as 1:2011cv02102
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant:
INDIANA GAMING COMMISSION AND ATHLETIC DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLBERT v. HAMILTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011cv02103
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant:
HAMILTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Colbert v. Hamilton County Courthouse
as 11-7100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Antonio Colbert
Defendant - Appellee:
Hamilton County Courthouse
COLBERT v. MALLORY
as 1:2011cv01396
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant:
DALE MALLORY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
