Cases 1 - 10 of 68
MYLAVARAPU et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2014cv00888
Plaintiff:
DINAKAR MYLAVARAPU and KRANTHI RUPANAGUNTA
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, ERIC HOLDER, LORI SCIALABBA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MARTIN et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2014cv00735
Plaintiff:
KENNY A. MARTIN, CARLOS ELLIS POWELL, ERIC JEROME POWELL and others
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, RONALD C. MACHEN, JR., STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
COFIELD v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01442
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC. , ERIC HOLDER , GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
WEISSER v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv01257
Plaintiff:
MARQUERITE WEISSER
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE OBAMA, WHITE HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALL v. MUELLER et al
as 1:2012cv01683
Plaintiff:
TONITA LOUISE HALL
Defendant:
ROBERT MUELLER, ERIC HOLDER, ALBERT L. LORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CIACCI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al
as 1:2012cv01651
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMBRON et al v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv01549
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PAUL CAMBRON and BRENDA CAMBRON
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PADMANI et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2012cv01159
Plaintiff:
MEGHANA PADMANI , HARESHKUMAR MANSUKHBHAI PADMANI and I.H.P.
Defendant:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC HOLDER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
STONE v. HOLDER
as 1:2012cv00010
Plaintiff:
GERALD STONE
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CALDWELL v. KAGAN et al
as 1:2011cv02100
Plaintiff:
KEITH R. CALDWELL, SR.
Defendant:
ELENA KAGAN, ERIC HOLDER, DOUGLAS HOWARD GINSBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
