Cases 1 - 10 of 10
In re: Subpoenas Served On:
as 23-7025
In Re:
In re: Subpoenas Served On:
Petitioner / Appellant:
American Academy of Pediatrics, Endocrine Society, World Professional Association for Transgender Health and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Jason Weida
In Re: SUBPOENAS SERVED ON
as 1:2023mc00004
In Re:
SUBPOENAS SERVED ON:
Petitioner:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, ENDOCRINE SOCIETY, WORLD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR TRANSGENDER HEALTH and others
Respondent:
JASON WEIDA
PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2020cv01181
Defendant:
ALEX AZAR, UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, STEPHEN M. HAHN and others
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN GROUP HOLDINGS LLC and PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
PUBLIC HEALTH LAW CENTER, PUBLIC CITIZEN, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
FOUNDATION HEALTH SERVICES, INC et al v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMP ANY
as 1:2016mc01522
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION HEALTH SERVICES, INC , HUNTINGDON NURSING CENTER, INC. , RAVENWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC. and others
Respondent:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMP ANY
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
ABA, INC. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2014cv00550
Plaintiff:
ABA, INC. , PREMIER HEALTH SERVICES, INC. , NURSING UNLIMITED SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Intervenor_plaintiff:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC.
Movant:
NURSING ENTERPRISES, INC. and VIZION ONE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKENZIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
NOLAN MCKENZIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARACK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KANSAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLETCHER v. AVENTURA HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2012cv01879
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER
Defendant:
AVENTURA HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER and MERCY NURSING HOME
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMBERT LANE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER v. LEAVITT
as 1:2008cv01450
Plaintiff:
HUMBERT LANE NURSING REHABILITATION CENTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. Council for Tobacco Research, et al
as 06-5267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice
Intervenor - Appellee:
American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Philip Morris USA Inc., formerly known as Philip Morris Incorporated, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, Directly and as successor by merger to AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Directly and as Successor to BRITISH-AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY, LTD
Special Master - Appellee:
Richard A. Levie
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Public Citizen, Inc., American College of Preventive Medicine and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Washington Legal Foundation, National Association of Manufacturers and National Association of Convenience Stores
Amicus Curiae:
Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Lung Cancer Alliance, Community Anti-Drug Coalition of America and others
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Citizens' Commission to Protect the Truth
Springfield Inc v. Buckles, Bradley A.
as 00-5409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Springfield, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Bradley A. Buckles, Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, U.S. Department of the Treasury
Terminated Party:
Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, Hispanic American Police Command Officers Association, International Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
The American Public Health Association, The National Association of School Psychologists, The National Spinal Cord Injury Association and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
